Skip to comments.
Growing oil well cavity could collapse as oil is squeezed out of the leak. (Vanity)
IMHO
Posted on 06/03/2010 2:34:57 PM PDT by 7thOF7th
With each gallon of oil that leaks out of the hole in the Gulf, a vacuous cavity is forming and no longer providing structural support to the subterranean oil deposit. It is this very pressure that pushes the oil out of the hole. Under normal operating conditions sea water or heavy mud is used to replace the volume of oil extracted. If nothing is filling the space of the leaking oil, a catastrophe of immense and long lasting impact could occur. If the ceiling of the subterranean cavern collapses, it will release the entire oil deposit into the Gulf of Mexico. This would be biblical in size and scope of disasters as over a billion gallons of crude oil and gas are released all at once. IMHO
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: hypothesis; theory; whoknows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
1
posted on
06/03/2010 2:34:57 PM PDT
by
7thOF7th
To: 7thOF7th
2
posted on
06/03/2010 2:36:57 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: PGR88
3
posted on
06/03/2010 2:37:30 PM PDT
by
randog
(Tap into America!)
To: 7thOF7th
Um, no.
Oil is contained in either cracks or voids within rock, shale, sand, whatever.
It’s not a big lake.
4
posted on
06/03/2010 2:38:13 PM PDT
by
TheThirdRuffian
(Nothing to see here. Move along.)
To: 7thOF7th
Just guessing....but I would guesstimate that the volume of oil forced to the surface after the last 46 days is equivalent to a fart in a windstorm. The leak would need to continue for a good long time before something like that to happen.
Now, I'm no oilman....but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
5
posted on
06/03/2010 2:38:15 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(You can only get smarter by engaging a smarter opponent.)
To: 7thOF7th
Definitely Bush’s fault if that happens.
6
posted on
06/03/2010 2:38:21 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: 7thOF7th
Thanks for the humor break. LOL! Don’t give up your day job.
7
posted on
06/03/2010 2:38:27 PM PDT
by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: 7thOF7th
That far down?
The cavity in question is under a few thousand feet of rock itself. Seems to me that if there was a collapse it would be far from the seabed.
I’m not a geologist so my physics may be off.
8
posted on
06/03/2010 2:38:39 PM PDT
by
Eyes Unclouded
("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
To: 7thOF7th
9
posted on
06/03/2010 2:39:49 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord)
To: 7thOF7th
Is there any reason to think this is anything but a wild-ass-guess?
Oil deposits have been emptied before without the cavity collapsing and instantaneously ejecting the remaining oil. To remove oil from the earth is not unusual. To remove oil quickly is not unusual. The only thing that is unusual is that we’re not capturing the oil.
SnakeDoc
10
posted on
06/03/2010 2:40:03 PM PDT
by
SnakeDoctor
("Shut it down" ... 00:00:03 ... 00:00:02 ... 00:00:01 ... 00:00:00.)
To: 7thOF7th
No way. There is 18,000 feet of rock between the oil and the sea floor.
11
posted on
06/03/2010 2:40:25 PM PDT
by
Freds2nd
To: 7thOF7th
12
posted on
06/03/2010 2:40:34 PM PDT
by
ASOC
(Things are not always as they appear, ask the dog chasing the car)
To: 7thOF7th
I saw it explained on one of the early “Oil Spill” threads (where a similar concern was raised) that underground oil does not take the form of giant lakes or bubbles - but rather resides in capillary-sized voids in otherwise solid rock - so an ‘implosion’ such as concern you is unlikely in the extreme...
13
posted on
06/03/2010 2:40:58 PM PDT
by
Uncle Ike
(Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
To: 7thOF7th
Hey, it's just an oil sand thousands of feet below the surface, it ain't a black hole.
14
posted on
06/03/2010 2:42:58 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
To: 7thOF7th
So, you’re a PhD level petroleum geologist, or have similar qualifications?
Or . . .
15
posted on
06/03/2010 2:43:31 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(No Representation without Taxation!)
To: Freds2nd
No way. There is 18,000 feet of rock between the oil and the sea floor.
There you go. Ruining a perfectly good chicken little tsunami.
16
posted on
06/03/2010 2:43:50 PM PDT
by
ZX12R
(IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!)
To: 7thOF7th
The scenario you present is not really possible. There are thousands of feet of rock above the oil deposit. I do wonder what effect techtonic pressure has on this leak though. It is a very volatile time all over the globe with volcanoes and earthquakes.
17
posted on
06/03/2010 2:44:40 PM PDT
by
wolfman
To: 7thOF7th
You mean that global warming was not making the seas higher it was land sinking form removing oil?
18
posted on
06/03/2010 2:45:03 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: 7thOF7th
What an ignorant, ill informed crock.
To: 7thOF7th
I would bet the reservoir is at least 10,000’ below the sea surface?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson