No I have not. I stated that Orly got Judge Carter and Judge Lamberth to state that the proper avenue to pursue a qou warranto against someone who illegally holds federal office is through the DC courts. I comprehend plenty. Standing, the political question, and jurisdiction. Once those are overcome, the eligibility case(s) can proceed on the merits to a rightful conclusion.
You're incapable of basic logic on this issue for two obvious reasons.
I stated logic clearly in post 12 in that other thread to you...you dumb-butt troll, which I gave you in a link. Maybe you're too dense to understand it.
One, you're unversed in how the law actually works. Two, you're completely irrational on this subject.
You are full of nonsense. I just told you above what the problems are.
You buy into every single loser of a case that rolls down this pike, because your emotional desire
Not hardly. I hope they don't pay your to write such silly tripe.
to have Obama out other than by the tried and true method of appealing to voters in elections has trumped your ability, or perhaps even your desire, to think clearly.
If you haven't noticed lately or are too obtuse to see that Obama is about to lose Congress this November. I think clearly enough to see that you shine Obama turds.
Every single case is the Holy Grail with you guys. Judge Carter was going to be the one until he made a correct, and obvious, legal ruling.
Every eligibility case is another case for you to troll.
Just like every army officer who makes the correct, and obvious, legal ruling on the Lakin case will be.
Huh? Every army officer? We will see how this all turns out in the end. There's no time limit to expose Obama.
Because you can't deal with the simple legal realities of these cases.
I deal with them quite well.
Not exactly. They said that a quo warranto case could not be brought outside of D.C., which is not the same thing as saying that a quo warranto can be brought against Obama in D.C. The U.S. District Court in D.C. has subsequently dismissed two quo warranto cases against Obama, including one brought by Orly.
Standing, the political question, and jurisdiction. Once those are overcome, the eligibility case(s) can proceed on the merits to a rightful conclusion.
How do you propose to overcome them?