Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Google to Dump Windows Internally Due to Security Concerns - hackers came thru the windows
Daily Tech ^ | June 1, 2010 9:22 AM | Jason Mick (Blog)

Posted on 06/01/2010 9:02:23 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Mr. K
So, technically it is superior- but in marketing and user-friendliiness it SUX HARD

Since the purpose of an Operating System is to facilitate the use of a computer by a user I think the user interface is an essential technical aspect.

For some tasks that are easy to set up in Linux, it's functionality makes dealing with its shortcomings worthwhile.

Of course the same can be said for Windows. It's functionality makes it's shortcoming worth dealing with. However, Windows has a far broader scope of functionality in which it is usable for far more people.

Security is also an essential aspect of a modern OS. In that Windows has come a long way. It's biggest problem is that users commonly don't want to deal with being asked if they are sure they want the app that ran when they clicked object in the email they got from aunt Gerturde to run as Administrator and modify system files. They don't really understand what it means, so they are just going to click OK anyway to make the box go away.

21 posted on 06/01/2010 10:11:46 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

My guess is that Google is thinking the public is the idiot and won’t know they are just laying the ground work to sell their own OS.

That being said I do think Microsoft is in trouble. They simply stopped innovating with the Netscape debacle. Instead of taking Netscape head on with the idea that we will stomp them by making a better browser they got tied up in legal battles and trying to end the life of their competition by any means other than simply making a better product. Microsoft has not had a sense of direction ever since.


22 posted on 06/01/2010 10:24:58 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

It seems like a no-brainer considering that now Microsoft is pretty much a direct competitor.


23 posted on 06/01/2010 10:27:12 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lees Swrd

I would also add that it no longer takes a Geek to run Linux it is now as easy if not easier than Windows. do you run Firefox, OpenOffice opps guess were they came from yep Linux or the open source community, the hardest thing I find in getting used to Linux is the program names Kaffeine, Vlc, These are media player,s! I would also add Smplayer one of if not the best media player around.
Games ah yes the most important thing, try Ultimate Edition Gamer’s download it for free burn it to a DvD and run it live you don’t even have to install to try it.
I am not against Window’s at all I just have a balky computer that did not like Vista instead of paying around $300 for an operating system I installed and started running Linux daily now I love it.


24 posted on 06/01/2010 10:38:57 AM PDT by Lees Swrd ("Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe and preserve order in the world as well")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
I agree with both of your points....Microsoft gets a lot of bad press...some deserved and some not. What I believe is the single most completely misunderstood concept is that if you replace Microsoft products with any of the unix/linux based operating systems and you are safe.....BULL CRAP! All you have done is exchange on set of risks with another. ANYBODY worth their weight in IT Security would know this...
25 posted on 06/01/2010 10:44:47 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776
Well....we could have a big debate on the differences architecturally between Unix based systems and the way Windows with it's heavily Legacy architecture system is put together...

I don't known what compares to Active X ...for Linux.

26 posted on 06/01/2010 12:12:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yes, yes, there are differences in each...the big picture is that real security is not just OS. All systems are vulnerable to some sort of of attack. The truth is most networks are most vulnerable from the inside. A determined advisory like state sponsored hacking (ie China)will know how to get around any OS...way too many layers to secure them all.
27 posted on 06/01/2010 1:40:40 PM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson