[If You Want It Fixed - Fix It]

I'd add something: discussing ideas instead of personalities helps the emotions out. Can you imagine discussing healthcare AND Obama versus just discusssing healthcare? Same for others with “Palin” on other issues.

She might flip or change - your position needn't if it is divorced of personality.

Drop several levels on an issue and see what their core thinking is - if you disagree there, why bother wasting time on subject levels up higher. Discuss the core issues and progress upward and you'll see where you agree and at what point/level you separate.

Why discuss Palin or Gingrich or Obama or Hillary if you think your tax money is wasted on too much fraud and lazy mixed in with the truly needy and your friend thinks people don't spend enough money helping the needy because they are stingy? How much are they paying in taxes? Who are they helping personally? What needy are they referring to?

The personalities only inflame logic and burn up the discussion!

[BenKenobi]

I’m a conservative in a generally conservative area with very, very liberal family.

I have friends from all over the spectrum. I make it clear with them that I’m a prolife conservative. I don’t make any apologies.

They either accept me or reject me.

[Future Snake Eater]

Also excellent advice, thank you as well.

[FreeReign]

I'd add something: discussing ideas instead of personalities helps the emotions out. Can you imagine discussing healthcare AND Obama versus just discusssing healthcare? Same for others with “Palin” on other issues.

If you discuss only the issues then you neglect half the debate. Connecting the politician to the issue is also important.