Skip to comments.
Is the Industry Souring On 3D TV?
TVPredictions.com ^
| May 26, 2010
| Philip Swann
Posted on 05/26/2010 4:26:32 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: ADemocratNoMore; advertising guy; aft_lizard; AJMaXx; Alice in Wonderland; american colleen; ...
Pinging the HDTV list..
HDTV pings!
2
posted on
05/26/2010 4:28:39 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Dave
(To anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
Internet enabled 3D TVs will be used for porn. There will be relatively little regular source material.
To: Las Vegas Dave
4
posted on
05/26/2010 4:29:14 PM PDT
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: Las Vegas Dave
I tried out the best 3d tv that they had at the Fry’s Superstore, wasn’t impressed.
They said it will be more effective if the screen was bigger and the room is dark like a theater. That just isn’t how we watch tv.
We will wait, not worth the price and in our mind it didn’t work.
5
posted on
05/26/2010 4:31:15 PM PDT
by
dila813
To: Las Vegas Dave
"Jumped the shark right from the start!"
6
posted on
05/26/2010 4:36:08 PM PDT
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: Las Vegas Dave
I remain amazed at the amount of money that was surely sunk into a technology that had virtually zero chance of widespread consumer acceptance. Folks are not gonna sit around in their homes wearing $200-each glasses to watch TV. Never had a chance.
MM (in TX)
7
posted on
05/26/2010 4:37:29 PM PDT
by
MississippiMan
(http://gogmagogblog.wordpress.com/)
To: Las Vegas Dave
Ralph Kramden (Honeymooners, 1955):
Do you want to know the reason I wont buy you a television set, Alice...Do you really want to know the reason?...the reason?...Well, Ill tell you the reason! Im waiting for 3d television!
http://www.techjaws.com/ralph-kramden-3d-tv-is-here/
8
posted on
05/26/2010 4:41:19 PM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: Las Vegas Dave
I’ve got no particular interest in 3D. If I’m going to wear something on my head to watch a movie it should be full-immersion VR. Now THAT would sell.
9
posted on
05/26/2010 4:41:22 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Las Vegas Dave
the dirty little secret is that BROADCAST HDTV is a bomb. Everyone I know who tries to receive it over the air has problems with reception.
10
posted on
05/26/2010 4:51:18 PM PDT
by
Arthur McGowan
(In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
To: Arthur McGowan
Eh, broadcast television is a waste of beautiful spectrum anyway. The sooner it dies, the better off we’ll all be.
11
posted on
05/26/2010 5:07:49 PM PDT
by
cvetic
To: Las Vegas Dave
The subject of 3D TV reminds me of the line from Jurassic Park which went something like "... you spent all this time thinking about what you can do, but never thought about what you should do...".
To: cvetic
But then you’ll have liberals claiming a “right to cable TV”.
Hell, for all I know they already do.
I see the future of digital TV as coming from Cell Phone towers. You subscribe to Verizon/AT&T TV and always have the same line up no matter where you go.
13
posted on
05/26/2010 5:55:33 PM PDT
by
RangerM
(A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
To: Ramius
If I'm going to wear something on my head to watch a movie it should be full-immersion VR.
14
posted on
05/26/2010 5:57:34 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: Las Vegas Dave
I called this as soon as it was announced on this ping list.
The demand for 3D will be very limited.
15
posted on
05/26/2010 6:10:50 PM PDT
by
G Larry
To: Arthur McGowan
the dirty little secret is that BROADCAST HDTV is a bomb. Everyone I know who tries to receive it over the air has problems with reception.
When it works, it's wonderful.
However, a lot of time it doesn't work. I live no more than 7 miles from the transmitters--and 4.5 miles from some--but there are still frequent dropouts from low signals. That's with an antenna aimed properly--and NO, I am not down in a valley.
I think I might need something like the Very Large Array to capture the digital transmissions from out of town stations I used to receive in analogue transmissions, however. Digital just doesn't get out there.
HDTV transmission needs to be fixed before anything else. And yes, there is a place for OTA television.
16
posted on
05/26/2010 7:14:12 PM PDT
by
Nepeta
To: Nepeta
I don’t know why we still bother with OTA broadcast. Cable simply has more bandwidth and less latency and a more reliable signal. Game, set, match.
17
posted on
05/26/2010 7:28:26 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Nepeta
Here in N. Dakota, people routinely picked up analog TV 100 miles from the transmitters. Not anymore. Now, I can’t get two out of the five Fargo stations—and I live in Fargo.
18
posted on
05/26/2010 7:30:04 PM PDT
by
Arthur McGowan
(In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
I am ~not~ going to wear glasses to watch TV.
19
posted on
05/26/2010 8:15:34 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
To: Arthur McGowan
I have almost zero problems with OTA HDTV. I’ll never go back.
Or look back, in case I turn into a pillar of salt.
20
posted on
05/26/2010 10:21:43 PM PDT
by
moonhawk
(Pre-order your "Don't blame me, I didn't vote!" bumper stickers here on Free Republic now.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson