To: steve0
IBTZ?
Viking Kitties?
Seriously, this would be a stupid well to try to “seal by nuke.” Too close to land.
2 posted on
05/21/2010 8:18:27 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
Why a zot? This is a serious topic, and it’s not too close to land. A mile of water does a lot to limit the range of damage, and a relatively small nuke would do the job.
The word “nuke” or “nuclear” scares people, though.
3 posted on
05/21/2010 8:22:14 PM PDT by
piytar
(Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Seriously, this would be a stupid well to try to “seal by nuke.” Too close to land.Really? Why? No fallout from a sub-seabed nuclear explosion. No fault lines to worry about. Let's stop being chickensh#ts about this and do what's right.
4 posted on
05/21/2010 8:23:02 PM PDT by
buccaneer81
(ECOMCON)
To: HiTech RedNeck
“Seriously, this would be a stupid well to try to “seal by nuke.” Too close to land.”
How is it too close to land? How many nuclear weapons have we exploded in the west? There have been hundreds....
5 posted on
05/21/2010 8:23:58 PM PDT by
babygene
(Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
To: HiTech RedNeck
why does it have to be a nuke explosion?
To: HiTech RedNeck
35 posted on
05/21/2010 9:02:10 PM PDT by
darkangel82
(I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson