Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: El Sordo
I can’t recommend Heinlein’s later works unless a person has very flexible views of morality.

Depends on what you mean by 'flexible'. I, like Heinlein, think that sin lies only in deliberately hurting someone else unnecessarily.

L

23 posted on 05/17/2010 7:55:45 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

That’s pretty much what I mean.


25 posted on 05/17/2010 8:00:26 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

” I, like Heinlein, think that sin lies only in deliberately hurting someone else unnecessarily. “

So much for 2,000 years of Christianity. Sigh.


42 posted on 05/18/2010 5:45:16 PM PDT by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Heinlein wrote about sex the way Robert E. Howard (Conan) did. I.e. he imagined it a hell of a lot more than he did it. Writing about women dropping their clothes and parading about naked is not sex.

Howard died a virgin. Heinlein was married thrice. If it wasn’t for that one scene in Farnam’s Freehold I would have said he never had sex either.

Heinlein kind of, sort of fortuitously tripped over the sexual revolution with Stranger in a Strange Land (only a few years after being accused of being a militarist after Starship Troopers) and clumsily made the most of it.


61 posted on 05/18/2010 8:26:39 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson