His argument is the state must be capitalist b/c it saved the banks. Thats not capitalism. in a real free market bailouts would be non-existant b/c the government wouldn’t interfere with the free market. he says capitalism needs a nanyn gov. to keep it going but everyone knows a nanny state can’t happen in true capitalism.
Quite right... I supposed I should have put a sarc tag there, but it was more along the case of rhetorical questions.