What more do I need? How about some accuracy. Please copy in the specific parts of the article that say what you wrote, particularly that part that went: animal control professionals, vets and others testifying that it was a danger and would attack again. Good luck with that - it's not there. The article states that the dog bit a vet and a friend of the owners. It also says a commissioner ordered the dogs destruction. Nice embellishments!
You have also either ignored or misunderstood what I wrote regarding the generic pit bull debate in order to argue the issue of this specific dogs' destruction - something I didn't address.
So sorry:
