Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel; Las Vegas Ron

Fascinating. They define ‘natural born citizen’ without ever referring to it...

Maybe you could join LVR in applying for a job reading minds.


600 posted on 05/17/2010 8:46:58 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

Gee Ms. Rogers, why is it none of these SCOTUS cases below never refer to these people as natural born US citizens, but in 1939, they refer to Ms. Elg as a natural born citizen?

1952, Kawakita v. United States, they referred to him as native born, but moreover, described him as a duel citizen who took an oath of allegiance to the US while a minor, and a 14th Amendment citizen.

In 1898, Wong Ark was only described as a native born who had alien parents.

In 1952, Mandoli v. Acheson. Mandoli was described as only native born of duel citizenship who had un-naturalized parents.

In 1958, Perez v. Brownell, AG. Perez was only described as a native born who had Mexican born parents.


605 posted on 05/17/2010 9:41:56 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson