Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator; Mr Rogers; rxsid; Fred Nerks; Red Steel
But unfortunately he is not alone. We have ex. "military" defectors, and armchair keyboard pretending attorneys who constantly jumps in like Arizona/Miami cock-fighters to protect their dear leader under the shield of pretending being Conservatives, claiming our Constitutional questions are crazy and bad for Conservatives. Give me a break!!!

Why do the want to keep an illegal alien and usurper in office at any cost if they were/are real Conservatives???

536 posted on 05/17/2010 11:33:20 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies ]


To: danamco; BP2; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator; rxsid; Fred Nerks; Red Steel

“We have ex. “military” defectors, and armchair keyboard pretending attorneys who constantly jumps in...”

A movement that has lost every case PROBABLY shouldn’t complain about the other side consisting of armchair attorneys. Let me know when you find one - ONE of 50 - state AGs that will issue a ruling that NBC requires two citizen parents.

“...claiming our Constitutional questions are crazy and bad for Conservatives.”

Golly...do I sound like Michelle Malkin? Constitutional questions aren’t bad, but weirdo conspiracy suggestions - such as suggesting I’m part of CIA psyops, or being paid by Obama - are out of line. It makes you look like a tin-foil freak.

“Why do the want to keep an illegal alien and usurper in office at any cost if they were/are real Conservatives???”

If we believe in the Constitution and law, we believe it for everyone. I had no use for the BDS types demanding GWB be removed because he lacked authority, or because he was illegally engaging in war, etc. I also have no use for folks who suggest the US military stop obeying orders, and take upon itself to decide if Obama was legally elected.

In the USA, Obama gets the same legal rights and protections that Charles Manson got. He gets the same protection GWB had as President.

A review of your posts to and about me would show lots of name-calling, but few if any facts.

Fact: Natural Born Subject was a standard legal term at the time the Constitution was written.

Fact: Multiple courts have argued that in a republic, a citizen is the equivalent of a subject in a monarchy.

Fact: Natural born subject did NOT require 2 subject parents. It probably required more than a parent just passing thru, which is why I object to applying WKA to anchor babies. However, there is a solid legal case for arguing that a NBC does NOT require 2 citizen parents.

AS of the moment, every state government agrees with me. Sarah Palin, Michelle Malkin & Rush Limbaugh agree - NONE of them have argued that Obama Sr makes Obama Jr ineligible. Every member of Congress agrees with me. The Supreme Court seems to agree, since they refused a case arguing your points in Dec 2008.

If you are serious about this and not just flapping Internet gums, then you need to approach a legislature such as Utah’s and see if you can get them to pass a law declaring a NBC requires 2 citizen parents. That would force a court fight, since Indiana has found that it does not. THEN you might achieve something other than attacking a conservative as a heretic for defining NBC differently than you do.

If you cannot convince a legislature in a state like Utah, you have no chance with the rest of America.

Until then, feel free to call me names...although there is a good chance I’m politically to the right of you. But anyone fighting in the courts is wasting time and money that needs to go into electing conservatives. And folks claiming I work for the CIA in psyops need to connect with the real world.


544 posted on 05/17/2010 1:43:15 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson