Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All
From deeper in the article:

*************EXCERPT******************

The “Dome”

Let's talk about the dome a little. It would appear from the photos that the dome is designed to be large enough to encase the BOP. It has mud mats 16 feet off the bottom, so obviously the idea is to let it sink into the mud which will stabilize the dome and keep it in place.

****************************************************

Image from a recent New York Times article

The dome should act as a primary oil/water separator and minimize the amount of water going up the drill string. But even better, if I understand the plan correctly, the leak will probably be above the oil/water interface (water will not entirely fill the dome), which means if the dome system is working smoothly, the oil leaking from the riser will never come in contact with the water before it heads up the drill string.

The dome has to be open to the sea water near the bottom, so the pressure will equalize. If the dome were to seal tightly to the seabed, any negative pressure created by the oil rising in the drill string would suck the surrounding mud sea bed right up into the drill string (this is the principal behind suction anchors for drill rigs), and possibly collapse the containment vessel.

I assume the way they will control the system will to be to monitor the level of the oil/water interface inside the dome and throttle the flow at top of the drill string to keep the oil/water interface at a set level.

It is to be connected to the Discoverer Enterprise with a 6-7/8” drill string. Based on some rough estimates I made, if a person assumes the specific gravity of the oil is 0.89, the specific gravity of sea water is 1.026, the depth is 5,000 feet (actually this is of little importance in calculating the maximum flow), and a freeboard of 33 feet to reach the drill ship deck piping, it should be possible to get about 24,000 bpd on the ship using the natural buoyancy of the oil alone. Most of my numbers, especially the specific gravity of the oil, are conservative, so the maximum throughput could be greater, maybe much greater.

If the drill string is filled with oil, the static pressure is entirely dependent on the specific gravity of the oil and the actual water depth. Roughly, if the specific gravity is 0.80, then the pressure at the water surface would be about 500 psi; if the specific gravity of the oil is 0.90, the pressure would be just under 300 psi.

In real life any entrained gas will make a major difference. If the drill string was entirely filled with gas, the static pressure at the surface would be over 2,200 psi. And as soon as you start mixed flow, you get into undefined territory unless you know the exact percentage of gas mixed in the oil.

Entrained gas in the leaking oil will greatly change the flow dynamics, as the gas will expand approximately 150 times going up the drill string and act as a giant airlift. The problem then won’t be getting the oil up the drill string; it will be throttling back the flow onboard the drillship. Luckily, a deepwater drillship will have the proper equipment to handle this.

The expanding gas also has a substantial cooling effect, enough to freeze the water entrained in the stream. So the design of the drill string has been modified to include a warm water jacket and a methanol (antifreeze) injection system.

They have a potentially dangerous situation separating the oil, gas and water, but since the Discoverer Enterprise has processing equipment on board they should be able to handle that safely. The Enterprise also has dual draw works and drill floor, so they are equipped to handle a second drill string to another dome if needed.

2 posted on 05/10/2010 10:58:14 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I’m pretty dumb.
Is this good news?


4 posted on 05/10/2010 11:03:35 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

From what I’ve read the “dome” is no longer being considered as a solution.


5 posted on 05/10/2010 11:10:25 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; onyx; blam; ...

ping.


9 posted on 05/10/2010 11:19:50 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I remember my Grandma telling me stories of how she and my mom used to stand on the beach and watch the burning tankers after they had been torpedoed by u boats early in the war.
I did a little investigating and found that we lost many ships, a large number of them tankers, during 1942-43.
A great many of these tankers were sailing close inshore because the Navy had routed them that way feeling it was better protection against U Boats. The problem was that they stood out against the brightly lit shore and became easy prey for any daring U Boat captain. The average amount of crude or gasoline in these ships was between 4000-7000 barrels in those days. I wish I had had the foresight to ask them what kind of damage to the shore all that oil did as it floated ashore.


12 posted on 05/10/2010 11:31:55 AM PDT by Larry381 (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks for your explanation. I have a newfound appreciation for just how difficult a process it is to successfully recover undersea oil, or to deal with problems that develop along the way. Putting a man on the moon hardly seems more difficult than trying to fix the problem with the leaking oil in the Gulf. It seems there are a thousand ways to go wrong and only one way (or very few) to get it right.


20 posted on 05/10/2010 12:35:48 PM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Why wouldn’t this idea work: Take a piece of small diameter pipe (say 1” or smaller). I’m assuming the pipe leaking the oil is not much bigger than 10”. Put an air fitting on the top end of the small pipe. Along the pipe, drill a small hole in the side. Clamp a bladder around the small pipe (a section of heavy duty balloon tubing, maybe made from the stuff the balloons were made of to float the 767 up from the Hudson), above and below the small hole drilled in the side. You could do this 2 or three times, depending on the length of pipe. Run compressed air (or compresses whatever)to the fitting at top of small pipe. Insert the small pipe down into the leaking riser, and send the air into the small pipe. The bladders inflate, sealing the riser, and all the pressure is going out against the leaking pipe. We made a prototype this morning with a half inch piece of copper pipe, drilled a hole in the side, clamped a piece of rubber inner tube above and below the drilled hole. Then we pumped water through a 6” piece of PVC pipe. When we stuck the copper pipe in and put the air to it, it immediately sealed up the pipe, totally. We could carry around the water filled PVC pipe by the copper one, no leaks. What’s wrong with this idea?


31 posted on 05/10/2010 3:02:33 PM PDT by genetic homophobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson