[allmendream]

The evidence is real, not “so called” and it does indicate that clearly Neanderthals are not human in morphology or DNA.

What is even clearer is that these things are closer related to human beings than any living species.

Science has an explanation that shows how all this data makes perfect sense. But obviously, unless someone works “the morning star” into a miraculous explanation, you are not interested.

Hard to reason with someone who isn't looking for a reasonable explanation, but a supernatural theological explanation. No amount of physical evidence is ever going to convince you that your theological opinion is incorrect, is it?

[Just mythoughts]

The evidence is real, not “so called” and it does indicate that clearly Neanderthals are not human in morphology or DNA. What is even clearer is that these things are closer related to human beings than any living species. Science has an explanation that shows how all this data makes perfect sense. But obviously, unless someone works “the morning star” into a miraculous explanation, you are not interested. Hard to reason with someone who isn't looking for a reasonable explanation, but a supernatural theological explanation. No amount of physical evidence is ever going to convince you that your theological opinion is incorrect, is it?

There is NOT one shred of evidence of interbreeding. Claiming a so call 'relationship' is pure imagination, as in one descending from an 'garden party' activity.

Science is code word for 'gods' of knowledge claiming interpretation of very limited evidence as meaning what is being claimed as fact.

What can there possibly be to reason? I am required to accept as 'gospel' evolution, because that is the man made standard. Nothing outside of that basic premise is considered as having reason.... But maybe when BamBamKennedy and his administration gets fully implemented these that are without reason might begin to question why they accepted such folly.