Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JoeProBono
So we have 95% if the DNA of a Chimpanzee and 1-4% of a Kneeanderthol. This does not compute.
20 posted on 05/07/2010 12:14:48 PM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mountainlion
Not at all. You are comparing apples and oranges.

Our DNA similarity to a Chimpanzee is 98% for genetic DNA and around 94% for genomic DNA.

Our DNA similarity with a Neanderthal would most likely be 99% for genetic DNA and around 97% or more for genomic DNA.

That is just comparing DNA sequences. It was from ANALYSIS of human DNA segments and comparison with Neanderthal segments that made them estimate that out of 100 great to the nth power grandparent the typical person has, one to four of them was a Neanderthal.

Do you perceive the difference?

If you got a Lion Tiger mix to successfully breed into the Tiger population, a few hundred years later you might estimate based upon DNA that that Tiger population was around 1 to 4% Lion.

That doesn't change the fact that Lions and Tigers are whatever % similar when comparing their genetic DNA.

33 posted on 05/07/2010 12:26:08 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson