In NYC, clubs operating with certain kinds of liquor licenses are prohibited from allowing underage (that is to say under 21) adults into their establishment during certain hours. Bristol, as a 19-year old, should not have been in the club at 1:00 am, irrespective if she was actually imbibing, or not.
I don't think (although I'm not completely sure) that someone who's under 21 can actually be cited in NYC if they aren't drinking. BUT, the establishment can be fined in liquor control authorities find underage adults or minors in their establishment during the prohibited times.
I can guarantee that if there was a problem, it would have been reported that way. Have you actually read the ridiculous article. What’s your take on their postion about Bristol, and of course, Palin. Supporters, you think?
Should not according to you.