To: rarestia
those of us who are prepared would likely be just fine hunting and gathering to survive.
There is a potential fallacy here. During the great depression, the deer were hunted to near extinction and took decades to recover. Something to think about when preparing the larder.
46 posted on
05/04/2010 5:45:52 AM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
To: PA Engineer
Hunter gathering isn’t the most effective means of survival. Hunter gatherer societies are usually nomadic by necessity. Farming on the other hand supports larger numbers of people, leads to trade and technological advances.
55 posted on
05/04/2010 5:52:11 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: PA Engineer
Actually, the deer population was at a low starting around the 1900's. Now, it is estimated that there are more deer in PA then when the first settlers arrived.
And every fall, when the deers go into rut, I-79 gets a fur coat.
To: PA Engineer
Different times, I fear. Back then, men weren’t afraid to go out into the forests to hunt for food. Nowadays, the metrosexual libbies would be in fits, starving for food, and begging for scraps of meat from those of us who know how to care for ourselves.
In my area, there are enough squirrels to feed a family of 4 for weeks. Provided we’re at the last resort, pets can make adequate sustenance, and knowing the local flora can help you stay fed, albeit not forever.
86 posted on
05/04/2010 6:05:46 AM PDT by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson