Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GOP_Party_Animal

I think you would see a pretty lopsided survival rate. Well under 50% in the city opposed to upwards of 70% in rural America.


14 posted on 05/04/2010 5:23:18 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

survival rate. Well under 50% in the city opposed to upwards of 70% in rural America.

And that’s a bad thing? Sagpants, comeyets and wannabes rightfully should be first in line.


190 posted on 05/04/2010 7:19:40 AM PDT by dusttoyou (libs are all wee wee'd up and no place to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek
upwards of 70% in rural America.

No electricity, no life sustainng drugs, no functional hospitals, no medical facilities, no manufactured foods, no transportation, no water. And with no functional sewage systems and all the dead bodies that will have to be dealt with, the old time diseases such as typhoid, cholera, yellow fever and many others will once again ravage the population with no means of protection via innoculations.

And here in Michigan with our winters and the dense population, how long will the wood supply last to heat all the homes that will be freezing? Heat will be the least of our worries......

I would say that if 30% of rural America survived the first year that would be very optimistic........

298 posted on 05/04/2010 10:09:22 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Peanut butter was just peanut butter until I found Free Republic.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson