I object to this `expert’s qualifications. Since you haven’t laid a foundation—why we should accept that his opinion is worth anymore than my opinion or yours, or Rahm Emmanuel’s, his `expert testimony’ is irrelevant to prove the truth of the matters asserted, that is, your position that obama is the real deal and we should all just hang our heads and walk away, Renee.
His offering is held inadmissable.
OK .... I’ll do it for you. http://www.bitwine.com/advisors/16252-docrjp
He sounds like an expert in a number of things, except document verification. Maybe as a professional witness, with a straw in his shoe, he will prepare himself to say just about anything you want?
Bailiff, whack his pee-pee.
Care to translate? And who is Renee?
Maybe, but you or I can follow his arguments and analysis and then judge for ourselves. That's what you should do with any "expert", including me, be he plumber, lawyer, doctor, or even Indian chief. e sounds like an expert in a number of things, except document verification.
AFAIK, there is no document to be verified.
It's sometimes easier to prove that an image has been messed with, than that it has not.
Or in this instance is something of a Franken-image, made up of parts of this and parts of that, and parts newly constructed.
I'm curious...
Were you on the threads during the summer and fall of 2008 when this person was active on the FR threads? If you were, you would have seen his qualifications in action. You may not agree that his qualifications meet scrutiny, but if you were here you would have at least seen his foundation laid.
-PJ