What I saw was Star Traveler making on-topic points, even though many disagree with her. I'd been having the same debate with her going back to June 2008 and the Chester Arthur discussions, but once each person's point is understood, saying it louder won't change minds.
So Star Traveler's position is that nothing short of voting Obama out of office will work. Fine. I get that. Chasing her from thread to thread to thread isn't going to change her mind, and this "you said, no you said" only clutters up the on-point posts and drives the rest of us away from continuing the on-point discussion.
I have to wonder who's purpose that really is?
-PJ
I don’t chase it at all, and never read it’s comments unless by accident. I read other peoples’ comments.