I don't know. Say, let's ask any ship in Nigerian waters!
Much less ones that could destroy, with ease, the state of the art semi-warships of a hundred or so years in the past.
Take a ship from the 1940s. Put it against a ship of the 1840s. Simple defensive weapons would crush it.
Take a ship from 2010. Put it against a ship from 1910. Simple defensive weapons would crush it.
Add to that much mining equipment can be repurposed as weapons. We even developed nukes for mining.
>>Much less ones that could destroy, with ease, the state of the art semi-warships of a hundred or so years in the past.
>
>Take a ship from the 1940s. Put it against a ship of the 1840s. Simple defensive weapons would crush it.
>
>Take a ship from 2010. Put it against a ship from 1910. Simple defensive weapons would crush it.
But my point wasn’t about any ship, it was about specific ships. What would happen to, say, a modern tanker if it went up against a 1910 battle-ship?
Here’s some 1910 era battleship info:
http://www.cityofart.net/bship/michigan.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_class_battleship_%281910%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_battleship_Vergniaud_%281910%29
Here’s modern tankers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_Large_Crude_Carrier
Consider that the battleships were equipped with things like: multiple 200+ and 300+ guns and armor designed for battle.
Consider, also, maneuverability. The simple physics are going to favor the smaller vessels for work-to-movement ratios.
Hmm - that show would be worth watching. Episode I: WWI-era Dreadnaught-class battleship (all available armament) vs. Sheffield-class destroyer (defensive weapons only). Better hope the battlewagon's gunners don't get a bead on that destroyer.
Next week's show: Iowa-class BB vs. DDX, same ROE. Last one afloat wins.
I think this is astute, regardless of the rest of the replies.