One more thing,
“The facts that are relevant in the California law are not in dispute by anyone.”
Really, I would bet that there are at least two people that dispute the facts. By definition, your statement is just silly.
Almost as silly as me responding to it, I think this thread has run its course. Good luck FRiend.
Really, I would bet that there are at least two people that dispute the facts. By definition, your statement is just silly.
Sorry to tell you... but the guy who paid $5,000 for the lost property is not disputing the facts ... LOL ...
In fact, what he did was actually report (i.e., what he wrote about it) is the fact that it was lost and that he paid $5,000 for it ... :-) ... hoo-boy!