Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangerdoc

The problem with the law still remains for both parties... as neither one attempted to get it back to the rightful owner (whomever that would be, if it wasn’t Apple’s) and my guess is that no matter whether they say they knew it was Apple’s or they thought it was someone else’s — they’re “nailed” either way ... LOL ...

This is a no-win situation for them.

You see... it’s not an Apple-pushed issue here... it’s a “legal issue” here which just happens to involve Apple. If they both did not believe it was Apple’s iPhone, they still both have a problem with the law and violating it and committing a felony, by not getting it back to the rightful owner, treating it like it is their own (in that it can be “sold” and “bought”). They’re in a heap of trouble even with it not being Apple’s iPhone prototype ... :-)


187 posted on 04/27/2010 2:40:31 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

If anybody has any kind of proof that they contacted Apple, the whole case could unravel.

If the finder claims he called Apple and they told him it was not theirs and he has proof of a call from his phone to Apple then the whole thing becomes a he said she said with the burden of proof suddenly falling on Apple if they initailly denied the call happened.

In fact, charges against Apple could follow.


189 posted on 04/27/2010 3:02:18 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson