Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vostok Sets Cold Record, Volcanic Ash Cuts AGW Advocates a Break
Daily Tech ^ | April 23, 2010 3:00 PM | Michael Andrews

Posted on 04/25/2010 11:21:43 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Not a place to be wondering around in a bathing suit that is for sure. To keep things in perspective. We should remind ourselves, mercury goes into it’s solid state form at -87 below zero F.


21 posted on 04/25/2010 4:35:46 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
How does it cut them a break?

It allows them to blame the lack of warming on volcanic ash rather than on their theories being bogus.

22 posted on 04/25/2010 4:57:23 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From Wiki:

Acclimatization to such conditions can take from a week to two months and is accompanied by headaches, eye twitches, ear pains, nose bleeds, perceived suffocation, sudden rises in blood pressure, loss of sleep, reduced appetite, vomiting, joint and muscle pain, arthritis, and weight loss of 3-5 kg (7-11 lb) (sometimes as high as 12 kg (26 lb)).

I've heard McMurdo can be a fun place, especially considering the party scene. But I think Vostok is close to the bottom of my list of places to see.

23 posted on 04/26/2010 9:45:49 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; steelyourfaith; Ernest_at_the_Beach; neverdem; narses; patton

Yes, that article (paper outlining a mathematical prediction for near-term climate oscilations based on a 60+ year short term cycle) is long, but a good start.

As I wrote in the comments sections at www.WattsUpWithThat.com discussing the idea, there are several ways the author needs to improve his function:

Apply the short-term 60 year cycle on top of a longer-term 800 year cycle, rather than adding it to a simple linearly increasing baseline.

Examine the Roman Warming Period, Dark Age Cold Period, Medieval Warming Period, and Little Ice Age IN ADDITION TO today’s Modern Warming Period, rather than in isolation.

Use this mathematical model as a basis to start a more fundamental physical model, not as a replacement for a physical model.

On the other hand, using a simple mathematically-derived function to prove wrong the badly-flawed CO2-AGW theory is correct in all regards.

Proving Theory A false with real-world data does NOT require that Theory B, Theory C, or even Theory D be proven correct.


24 posted on 04/26/2010 10:12:22 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Must have been all the planes NOT flying didn't offset the volcano... heads they win, tails we lose. ;') Thanks Ernest.
25 posted on 04/28/2010 7:14:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson