“Except that Palin is not popular with the independent, swing and middle road voters she would need to win.”
Translation:
“support Mitt Romney””
I think that one falls under the 4th category
.....Calling someone a libtard is not debate.
Calling someone a HuffPost poster is not debate.
Claiming someone is just regurtating MSM talking points is not debate.
Calling someone a Paulbot, Huckster or Mittbot is not debate.
Shouting “READ HER BOOK!” is not debate.
Calling for peoples banning is not debate.
Lying about her record is not debate.
Pinging Jim to threads is not debate.
Continuously posting a rant by Jim from several months ago to intimidate others is not debate.
Changing the subject is not debate.
...and you are a RINO enabler sjb.
They can’t help themselves.
What?? But this thread of almost 300 is just a message for those that he says should be banned(’Just a message for the Anti-Palin crowd’). That is not debate ???
Now I get it, you cant have a debate if the freeper you disagree with gets banned just because he disagrees with you. Thanks for teaching me new ideas :)