[LS]

I’m still not sold that Hatfill is innocenct. Yes, he won the case of INVASION OF PRIVACY, and this was based on the absence of an indictment or arrest, which came because of insufficient evidence. I know I’m alone in this, but there were a number of things at the time that indicated he had some involvement, and I still wonder if he wasn’t either a dupe or was being blackmailed in some way to give AQ some help.

[Mr. Lucky]

It isn't incumbent upon a citizen to prove that he is innocent of government charges; proving a negative isn't possible. Rather, it's the government's responsibility to prove the truth of the charge. In the Hatfill case, the government failed miserably.