Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody
Since when do other countries get to decide which of our citizens is eligible?

Turn that around ... since when does the United States get to decide which of a foreign country's citizens is eligible? I'm talking about children born in foreign countries to parents who are US citizens. It cuts both ways ...

The Constitution was written in a time when travel was harder and moving was more or less permanent. Aliens in most countries were permitted to be naturalized - and their children were deemed to be natural born. This, since most would never move again. As long as the alien parents' nation DID NOT lay a claim on the child ...

Now, with our ease of travel, the Founding Fathers would accept our current understanding that a child who was born on foreign soil is a natural born citizen, as long as his parents are US citizens and the foreign country DOES NOT lay claim to the child. Otherwise, the child is a citizen - though NOT natural born.

452 posted on 04/21/2010 12:31:39 AM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]


To: Lmo56; cynwoody

I’ve always thought, and felt that the most important and maybe prime unstated aspect of NBC was the notion of upbringing.

A child born of 2 citizen parents and raised in country would be hard pressed not to absorb at his/her parents knees the History, Traditions, Laws, Mores, Culture, etc. of the United States. Although not assured, wouldn’t that child most likely grow up to be a Patriot/citizen of the first order?

I contrast the above thought with Obama’s narrative.... Born to an American mother, and a foreign Father, a broken marriage, a marriage to another foreign national by his mother, relocation to Indonesia, adoption and new Indonesian citizenship, another breakup of the marriage, relocation back to Hawaii, raised by grandparents, mentored by a Black, pediphile, communist writter, attending college as a “foreign student” in order to game the system and get financial aide via a Fullbright Scholorship, sponsoring by other foreign interests through Columbia, and Harvard, employment with the most radical elements of US Society, friendships with 60’s era Domestic Terrorists, a radical Church membership that preached hate for the US.....

How close does Obama come to the ideal I think that the founders had in mind?...... Is he the antithesis of what the founders envisioned when they set out the requirements for the Presidency.....I believe so, don’t you?


457 posted on 04/21/2010 1:19:25 AM PDT by Forty-Niner ((.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson