Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lmo56

I thought that “Qou Warranto” was used to remove a sitting official?

could you clarify?


410 posted on 04/20/2010 9:17:17 PM PDT by Forty-Niner ((.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: Forty-Niner
I thought that “Qou Warranto” was used to remove a sitting official?

could you clarify?

Quo Warranto [by what warrant] ...

This was originally a method by which a sovreign could confiscate a noble's land that he coveted.

A writ Quo Warranto would be issued and the noble would be obligated to prove that he was entitled to the land - if found to be ineligible, his land reverted to the sovreign. Of course, the sovreign usually got someone to swear [true or not] that the noble was a bastard and, thus, not entitled.

In modern times, Quo Warranto is normally used to try to remove someone from office - or to challenge the presumed victor in an election to prove that he is eligible to the office.

447 posted on 04/21/2010 12:13:28 AM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson