Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

You posted “Try going down to the courthouse and undoing the facts listed on divorce papers on file in the state of Hawaii in a 1960’s action in which both parties are now deceased. Then speak to me about “silly

So are you saying that the iformation on birth certificate that the POS odumbo tried tofoist off is a complete and accurate original birth certificate?


312 posted on 04/20/2010 5:46:50 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: RWGinger; Uncle Chip

What he may be saying (and I’m chiming in, he can correct what he means if need be) that 0bama has, by presenting the COLB plus his two “autobiographies”, committed himself legally and otherwise to having 0bama Sr as his father. He’s boxed himself in, so to speak. So if 0bama Sr is not his father, he’d have to admit that the COLB is a total forgery and lie plus his books are lies.

And now, since all of 0bama’s relatives except putative Kenyan ones and a great uncle or so are all dead and gone, no one is around to say “yea” or “nay”. His mother could say who his father is without doubt (unless she had a bunch of men around), and 0bama Sr could at least say whether he had relations with Stanley Ann or not. But, they could both lie. So, how to tell for sure?

0bama Sr’s other son Mark with the African last name could give a DNA sample and 0bama could give one and they could be matched to see if they are actually related by blood.

But I don’t see that happening in the near future!

Also, even if 0bama Sr is the actually sperm donor, that doesn’t mean anything or everything else on the COLB is factual, since it’s pretty well determined that the thing is forged.


331 posted on 04/20/2010 6:29:04 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

To: RWGinger
So are you saying that the iformation on birth certificate that the POS odumbo tried tofoist off is a complete and accurate original birth certificate?

Anytime you have legal counsel who puts his name on the document and then files with the state and the document then becomes part of the public domain, then that document has more credibility than a photograph on the internet. Ask any lawyer if they would risk losing their license by filing papers with the state without documented evidentiary backup. Ask Nancy Pelosi -- that signator of those 49 state affidavits.

She had legal counsel involved with her divorce papers. Her divorce lawyer would likely have required a copy of all necessary documents, including the birth certificate, for his file.

Barack Obama Sr was served with the divorce papers, and did not contest the divorce or anything in the divorce papers, including the statement that they had a child together, Barack Obama. And then the divorce papers were filed with the state of Hawaii, and have been part of the public domain for decades without objection or contestation from anyone, a divorce that was a necessary prerequisite for her subsequent marriage to Lolo Soetoro.

Any birth certificate at this point that lists anyone other than Barack Obama as his father will be highly suspect in light of those divorce papers on file.

469 posted on 04/21/2010 6:18:41 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson