"The two announcements in the Hawaiian newspaper in 1961 only prove a birth was REGISTERED there, not that he was born there. A registration was allowed under Hawaiian law in 1961 to be made by any family member via a simple mail-in form to the state Health Department. No 3rd party or independent witnesses to the birth were required. The statement of a family member registering a new born child as born home was accepted into the registration system with little or no questions back then. Thus the family could lie and register a birth in Hawaii when it occurred elsewhere, anywhere in the world, simply to get the child U.S. citizenship, a highly coveted status then and now. The false registration was not done so he could be President some day. The false registration was done to get the new born child citizenship for that time. It was a case of birth registration fraud to illegally gain U.S. citizenship for a foreign born child of the family." More from Mario Apuzzo (Attorney) at his blog
Hawaii had extremely lax birth registration laws in 1961.
Those newspaper ads mean NOTHING, ZIP, ZILCH, NADA about where exactly Obama was born. If you believe it does, then you don't believe in identity theft or birth certificate fraud. If that's the case you're hopelessly braindead.
but.....But....but....
I am hopelessly brainless.