Posted on 04/20/2010 1:35:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
“....quite a few who voted for Obama, would flip out and demand it be fixed.”
.
You really think so? The Obama voters I know were all brain dead on election day, and my opinion of them has not changed. Most of them still think they made the right choice.
what if, as bub thinks the kenyan is not the father of odumbo?
What if the father is the black commie Davis?
then odumbo would have an American born father and mother.
and would therefore be natural born.
____________
That is correct and the BC issue would no longer be an issue. The issue then would be that he was a liar, but we already know that.
Well, if Obama is removed from office and Biden and Pelosi are removed from the line of presidential succession for complicity in a crimes against the Constitution, then Robert Byrd would be President. If he too was for some reason removed from the line of succession for his own involvement then we have a serious problem and we will have neither a President nor a Vice President. Because if Obama is ruled to be illegally President, that would mean ALL of the Cabinet officials he appointed would not be in the Presidential line of succession because they were not appointed by a US president. Consequently, they too are ineligible to be president.
“....Born in the country to 2 citizen parents..... sorry, Obama is not eligible....”
.
McClown knew about it but didn’t say anything when he ran against 0. Seems to me he was running interference for 0. The plot only deepens.
Who signed the divorce papers??? Both of them signed those papers.
______________
No, they did not. Sr. never signed them. Feel free to look it up. He didn’t sign them. They were delivered to him, he never accepted them.
Technically correct. However, if they wouldn’t take it BEFORE Obama was sworn in, do you REALLY think they will take it up 2 years later?
I don’t.
SCOTUS has rules - such as "standing", etc. Lots of times, when a question is so politically charged, they hide behind the skirts of their robes and use procedures to justify why they won't even hear a case.
Now, lets say Obama wins the election in 2012 - if the GOP contender took it to SCOTUS, they COULD NOT refuse to hear it because he [or she] DOES have standing via quo warranto ...
Why was that the first thing he did? Seriously, do you believe half the crap you write?
The elections in 50 states and DC are under their statutes [per the Constitution]. There are many states that declare elections null and void if fraud is proven - even after the original winner has assumed office.
Robinette? LMAO!
COLB - Certificate Of Live Birth. An abstract, NOT the original BC ...
From what I can pick out of my mental filing cabinet, they were sent to his address in Boston; and he didn’t sign them. IIRC there was nothing on the divorce papers (I remember readint them all except that missing page) indicating that he saw them and refused signing, or if they were just left in a mailbox and got sent back.
Do you remember anything more detailed?
You are kidding, right? Besides, it doesn’t matter where he was born. He could have been born IN the White House and it still would NOT make him eligible. He was born a subject of the British Crown. End of story.
It is frustrating, but try not to be depressed. Just remember what you see posted here on the forum is a tiny fraction of what is really known and also there is also disinformation posted here to throw off the snoopers. There is much work going on behind the scenes and it will come out at the right time. Be patient.
Well, then it’s about time they learn about the Constitution, or we will never have peace, security, or safety — and that’s guaranteed if we do nothing.
Malcom was much better looking than Barry the Kenyan.
“3. He could elect NOT to run in 2012 - which would NOT require him to prove anything ...”
.
And what would happen if, later on, it can be shown without the shadow of a doubt that Obama never was eligible to be POTUS and that he and others were aware of this fraud?
Can he and his fellow conspirators be prosecuted and will the laws signed by him be valid or will they be repealed?
Really? I thought Vittal’s Law of Nations was published in 1757? Are you telling me that 40 years later he wrote a revision?
I thought he was dead!
I’ll look it up to be sure.
Library of Liberty.org?
aleksandreia.wordpress.com?
Have a more mainstream link? I don’t make a habit of visiting fringe websites. Won’t here either....nice try.... no cigar....
This is as clear as mud - absent a SCOTUS ruling. A child born in the US is a citizen at birth [14th Amendment], but if his parents are citizens of another country [specifically, the father] AND that country asserts natural born status on the child, the child MAY or MAY NOT be a natural born citizen of the US.
Taking into account the probable definition that the Founding Fathers would have used - the child WOULD NOT be NBC, but that HAS NOT been decided by SCOTUS ...
A Honduras moment!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.