To: All; steelyourfaith; NormsRevenge; Fred Nerks; blam; SunkenCiv; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; ...
Image is more a bit more readable at the WUWT Website:
Image of the Model output
Now we get a discussion of how close to reality the computer model is for this event!
To: All
From a comment we have the BBC:
EU moves to ease Europe flight curbs
Video at the link....
And:
***********************EXCERPT*************************************
According to current European regulations, no matter how low the concentration of ash, no commercial aircraft should fly as long as it is in their path.
A spokesperson from from Nats told BBC News that there was "no threshold" for concentrations at which volcanic ash was acceptable.
The dust is simply too dangerous for jet engines to risk commercial flights encountering it, said Nats. If volcanic ash particles are ingested into a jet engine, they accumulate and clog it with molten glass, which can cause the engine to shut down.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 4horses+amule; Nervous Tick; Amagi; Beowulf; Tunehead54; Clive; ...
6 posted on
04/19/2010 3:07:56 PM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(Warmists as "traffic light" apocalyptics: "Greens too yellow to admit they're really Reds."-Monckton)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is a mixed bag. If planes where to experience in-flight engine failures, other related incidents, e.g. frosted cockpits etc., then someones head would roll. I can see their collective initial concerns. It was not unreasonable.
Perhaps this time around I'll stay neutral on the issue. Even though I read parts of WUWT site... "MET office, computer models".
10 posted on
04/19/2010 6:12:23 PM PDT by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson