Replies

I’m sorry to disappoint you but Dr. Fukino was quite clear in her statement: SHE VIEWED THE ORIGINAL OBAMA VITAL RECORDS.
LOLOLOL.

Did she make her statement under oath??? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Did she back up her statement by releasing the ORIGINAL VITAL RECORDS that she supposedly viewed????? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Did she violate Hawaiian Law by making that statement and then subsequently not releasing the records that she relied upon to make that statement as required by Hawaiian Law??????????? YEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

That makes her a lawbreaker and lawbreakers have no credibility. Their words like her words as a lawbreaker covering up incompetence and corruption are meaningless.

Perhaps she would like to come to Court and issue her statement UNDER OATH where it can be cross-examined. If not, then her words like your posts mean diddly-squat.

If any of the Obama eligibility lawsuits should ever make it to trial I am sure that Dr. Fukino WILL be subpoenaed to testify under oath and that subpoena will come from the U.S. government lawyers representing Obama.
However thus far 69 Obama elgibility lawsuits have been dismissed, denied, or rejected on appeal and 5 are still pending.
Since the Hawaii Attorney General’s office has not initiated an investigation into whether Dr. Fukino violated any Hawaii statute and since her statement was released on July 29, 2009, 9 months ago, its not looking too good for your supposition.
Time will tell! ;-)