Replies

Just because Dr. Fukino’s verification statement isn’t good enough for you doesn’t mean that it isn’t good enough for the courts that have looked at this issue

The courts haven't looked into this. They have all evaded it -- and you know that but you continue to lie, don't you???

Tell Fukino to submit her statement under oath to one of those courts and she will run like a scared rabbit.

The courts haven’t looked into this. They have all evaded it — and you know that but you continue to lie, don’t you???

Tell Fukino to submit her statement under oath to one of those courts and she will run like a scared rabbit.

Your statement demonstrates that you are ignorant of the difference between “looking into an issue” and a judge, a panel of judges or a Supreme Court dismissing a lawsuit after reading the legal briefs from both sides before rendering an opinion. So I’ll just let your ignorance pass.

As a state government official Dr. Fukino would have no choice but to raise her hand and swear an oath if any Obama eligibility case ever made it to trial. That appears to be unlikely since 62 lawsuits have been rejected thus far including seven rejections by the US Supreme Court. The latest dismissal, “Taitz v Obama” was just dismissed last week by a Ronald Reagan appointed federal chief judge.

Any prosecuting attorney in the nation could subpoena Dr. Fukino to testify in a Grand Jury investigation and she would be obligated to show up as well. Isn’t it interesting that no prosecuting attorney in America has convened a Grand Jury investigation of Obama for forgery and/or fraud.

Dr. Fukino was appointed by and works for the Republican Governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle and her statement about Obama’s birth documents was reviewed and approved by the Attorney General of Hawaii, Mark. L. Bennett who is also a Republican.