[AmishDude]

The proper Conservative position on marijuana use is to leave it up to the States to formulate their own policies on it.

So how is, for example, Utah supposed to ban it outright if, for example, Nevada decides to make it, say, almost completely unregulated? How is Utah supposed to exercise its states' rights under such a situation?

But what amuses me most is the priorities of the libertarians: Potheads plus the welfare state. What can possibly go wrong?

[Lurker]

Utah supposed to ban it outright if, for example, Nevada decides to make it, say, almost completely unregulated?

Those two States seem to do just fine regulating gambling and prostitution within their borders. Why should a stupid plant be any different?

But what amuses me most is the priorities of the libertarians: Potheads plus the welfare state.

Thanks for putting your astounding ignorance of Libertarian principles on display for all of us to enjoy. Libertarians HATE the welfare state and would end it tomorrow if it weren't supported by BOTH the Republicans and the Dems.

L

[Lurker]

Utah supposed to ban it outright if, for example, Nevada decides to make it, say, almost completely unregulated?

Those two States seem to do just fine regulating gambling and prostitution within their borders. Why should a stupid plant be any different?

But what amuses me most is the priorities of the libertarians: Potheads plus the welfare state.

Thanks for putting your astounding ignorance of Libertarian principles on display for all of us to enjoy. Libertarians HATE the welfare state and would end it tomorrow if it weren't supported by BOTH the Republicans and the Dems.

L

[Ken H]

The welfare state, like national marijuana prohibition, is made possible by the New Deal Commerce Clause. You sound like a not so closeted Wickardista.

Do you think the New Deal Commerce Clause is in keeping with its original understanding... yes or no?