Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh
They want the MIND ALTERING part of the drug.

Is that not true of coffee and alcohol as well? The fundamental political axiom I operate by is that I own myself!

Why is Peyote verboten for most people, but ok for Native Americans?

As a small gov't conservative, I apply the test of Occam's Razor to laws. If there is no reason for a law to be on the books, get rid of it!

Or would you prefer Mexican drug cartels taking over our National Parks, ringing them with machine gun-toting thugs and growing it, using the profits to foment more violence, here and in Mexico? Why not take a big bite out of their operations with legalization?

What moral zealotism drives so many to want to regulate everyone's state of mind?

21 posted on 04/16/2010 7:04:51 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (President Zero, walking in the footsteps of Hugo Chavez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: ARepublicanForAllReasons

As long as your altered state of mind is within the confines of your residence and not in public, I for one could care less about what one puts into their body. Also the taxpayer should not be on the hook for any medical conditions/treatment resulting from said ‘self medication’. However if their altered condition causes harm to another then they should be put down like a rabid dog. With these conditions, I’m for leagalization.


25 posted on 04/16/2010 7:32:30 PM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson