Sadly his Obama sized ego has him believing that he has scored a galactic sized victory by declaring:
All your quotation marks are belong to us.
What are you a baby? Whaaa.. you're wrong, Whaa... Alot of folks on this thread made the same point to you. That your Quote marks were stupid and your example of a Gaffe wasn't a gaffe but instead you were simply repeating a lie... and you just refuse to get that. Tina Fey made this statement, not Sarah Palin. This is not a Palin "gaffe." It was a comedy skit that was spun into a lie by the press and bloggers and folks like you that continue to place these words in her mouth. As you had intended this tread to be about Obama's numerous gaffes, this example was an especially poor one, because it was offensive to anyone who hates what the MSM is attempting to do to Palin.
I have stated before an will one more time.. state that Palin referring to notes on her hand was blown up into a manufactured "gaffe" where your stupid quotation marks would have been perfectly proper, and Palin handled this well all by herself by making fun of the folks who attempted to make a big deal of this.
Your example of a Gaffe is a lie. And a lie repeated with quotation marks around it is still a lie.
Worse, the context of this post provides your two examples of Sarah Palin "gaffes" and then challenged folks to come up with a list of additional Palin gaffes. Worse, then you ask, "Compared to Obama, I don't see how THIS WOMAN has had as many gaffes as Obama?" Clearly equating these first two examples on a list against stuff attributed to Obama as if these were equivalent examples.
You wrote. "Can someone tell me how many "gaffes" Palin has had besides the "I can see Russia from my house" via Saturday Night live"
You could have written, "Can someone tell me how many "racist" incidents the Tea Party has had besides the "Yelling N'words at the Congressmen at the Washington Protest" via ABC News?"
This equivalent calumny would draw an equivalent reaction from a different group. These two statements are of exactly the same formulation, each with a similar embedded libel. And, both are equally odious. The quotes around the "racist" description do not indicate at all that the whole proposition is a lie in the first place. And, neither do your quotes around "gaffe."
What puzzles me, is why seven days after this thread died, did you decide to bring this junk back up like a Vampire from the dead. You say you are a regular guy, but my Troll meter is starting to register something amiss.
Most people would have apologized for the bad wording or even more appropriately asked a mod to help change the wording if it was causing problems. Instead, you took the time to berate 16 out of 45 different posters to your thead calling them stupid and such and that just isn't cool. Yes, you had a few defenders, but most of this thread and certainly our recent interchange has been more about what getting the last word.
Overall, you just upset a bunch of people and for some reason you decided to come back to get in my face and I don't appreciate it. Especially when the point you are trying to make is vile. This sort of behavior is the mark of a Troll.
Your history: 35 posts in 6 years prior to this thread. 16 of these are vanities. I don't see any real evidence of Trolling. My advice, cut down on the vanities and learn to play nicer. Your behavior in this thread is nothing to be proud of. This is bad for Free Republic and and bad for you if you intend to be taken seriously.
I leave it to everyone else to comment further if they care.
Sadly his Obama sized ego has him believing that he has scored a galactic sized victory by declaring:
All your quotation marks are belong to us.
“What are you a baby? Whaaa.. you’re wrong, Whaa... Alot of folks on this thread made the same point to you. That your Quote marks were stupid and your example of a Gaffe wasn’t a gaffe but instead you were simply repeating a lie... and you just refuse to get that. Tina Fey made this statement, not Sarah Palin. This is not a Palin “gaffe.” It was a comedy skit that was spun into a lie by the press and bloggers and folks like you that continue to place these words in her mouth. As you had intended this tread to be about Obama’s numerous gaffes, this example was an especially poor one, because it was offensive to anyone who hates what the MSM is attempting to do to Palin.
I have stated before an will one more time.. state that Palin referring to notes on her hand was blown up into a manufactured “gaffe” where your stupid quotation marks would have been perfectly proper, and Palin handled this well all by herself by making fun of the folks who attempted to make a big deal of this.
Your example of a Gaffe is a lie. And a lie repeated with quotation marks around it is still a lie.
Worse, the context of this post provides your two examples of Sarah Palin “gaffes” and then challenged folks to come up with a list of additional Palin gaffes. Worse, then you ask, “Compared to Obama, I don’t see how THIS WOMAN has had as many gaffes as Obama?” Clearly equating these first two examples on a list against stuff attributed to Obama as if these were equivalent examples.
You wrote. “Can someone tell me how many “gaffes” Palin has had besides the “I can see Russia from my house” via Saturday Night live”
You could have written, “Can someone tell me how many “racist” incidents the Tea Party has had besides the “Yelling N’words at the Congressmen at the Washington Protest” via ABC News?”
This equivalent calumny would draw an equivalent reaction from a different group. These two statements are of exactly the same formulation, each with a similar embedded libel. And, both are equally odious. The quotes around the “racist” description do not indicate at all that the whole proposition is a lie in the first place. And, neither do your quotes around “gaffe.”
What puzzles me, is why seven days after this thread died, did you decide to bring this junk back up like a Vampire from the dead. You say you are a regular guy, but my Troll meter is starting to register something amiss.
Most people would have apologized for the bad wording or even more appropriately asked a mod to help change the wording if it was causing problems. Instead, you took the time to berate 16 out of 45 different posters to your thead calling them stupid and such and that just isn’t cool. Yes, you had a few defenders, but most of this thread and certainly our recent interchange has been more about what getting the last word.
Overall, you just upset a bunch of people and for some reason you decided to come back to get in my face and I don’t appreciate it. Especially when the point you are trying to make is vile. This sort of behavior is the mark of a Troll.
Your history: 35 posts in 6 years prior to this thread. 16 of these are vanities. I don’t see any real evidence of Trolling. My advice, cut down on the vanities and learn to play nicer. Your behavior in this thread is nothing to be proud of. This is bad for Free Republic and and bad for you if you intend to be taken seriously.
I leave it to everyone else to comment further if they care.”
Nice rebuttal, well done!