Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CommieCutter
I didn’t repeat them as if they were true. This is why they were called “gaffes”. This is what the opposition was calling true.

NO YOU ARE WRONG. YOU CANNOT COMMIT A GAFFE IF YOU NEVER MADE THE COMMENT IN QUESTION. Your example was of a comment made by Tina Fey. This is not a Palin Gaffe no matter how you might want to spin the issue. It is a lie. One that has been told as the truth and shame on you for keeping it going.

As you are having a difficult time with the meaning of the word.. I will provide the definition. No where in any definition of Gaffe does the issue of slanderous misquotes exist.

Definition of gaffe - Free Dictionary

167 posted on 04/26/2010 2:38:09 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: dalight

I said:
“I didn’t repeat them as if they were true. This is why they were called “gaffes”. This is what the opposition was calling true.”

Your response:
“NO YOU ARE WRONG. YOU CANNOT COMMIT A GAFFE IF YOU NEVER MADE THE COMMENT IN QUESTION.”


Anyone with half a brain can tell by your above response you’ve proven, yet again, your lack of ability to process information.

I’m also sorry you don’t understand the utilization of quotation marks :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark This really— in a nutshell— is the problem.

Quotation marks were around the word in question. Secondly quotation marks from the phrase in question were followed by “via Saturday Night Live”, which would indicate the quote came from a KNOWN FICTIONAL SOURCE.

Unfortunately for you and others, the application of your reading skills stopped at the phrase in question which immediately garnered a response.
Otherwise, if it were understood the way you zealots have portrayed it/spun it after the fact; you would have at least acknowledged the perceived error and added some additional information to answer the REQUEST that was apparent in the original posting. Intent would have also been understood initially. This did not happen,why? Because the entire post was NOT READ by those upset by it, including you.

You’re wrong.


168 posted on 04/26/2010 3:06:15 PM PDT by CommieCutter (..If you think about it they are all sucker rallies...the pros know when to get out...-- Hojczyk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson