To: familyop
You are aware, of course, that ad hominem automatically negates *anything* of value you *may* have had to say, don’t you?
[You *almost* slithered under the wire by merit of ambiguity/interpretation/etymological technicality but you just *couldn’t* resist “annotating” your definition, could you? Game over. Thanks for playing. Good bye.]
103 posted on
04/15/2010 12:24:25 AM PDT by
Salamander
(....and I'm sure I need some rest but sleepin' don't come very easy in a straight white vest.......)
To: Salamander
" You are aware, of course, that ad hominem automatically negates *anything* of value you *may* have had to say, dont you? [You *almost* slithered under the wire by merit of ambiguity/interpretation/etymological technicality but you just *couldnt* resist annotating your definition, could you? Game over. Thanks for playing. Good bye.]"
He has no idea what you just said.
107 posted on
04/15/2010 12:31:31 AM PDT by
shibumi
(FReepMail me to get on the "Hippo Attack" ping list!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson