I am a scientist. The theory of evolution is the underlying theory of biology, much as the theory of universal gravitational attraction is the underlying theory of astronomy. Almost every biological discovery was made possible or eased by the understanding that knowledge of evolution has brought.
If you want a place where creationists are free to make as many ridiculous claims about evolution as they wish, declare that creationism is your religion and you can have a closed caucus thread where creationist can merrily say obviously incorrect things and nobody will be the wiser.
Because most creationists don't just reject the theory of evolution, they don't understand the theory of evolution.
Perhaps that is why the more educated a person is the less likely they are to be a creationist.
I only wanted you to stay on the topic of the article, not put words in peoples mouths, not hijack the thread, and not resort to personal insult. You failed in all of these.
You claim to be a scientist, but you come across as a evangelist for evolution. The evolutionist makes a mockery of true education. You have a degree in being indoctrinated, thats all. I could put up plenty of material for that but its for another thread.
Like I said, I am totally unconcerned about your value judgments of creationists, their education, and your insulting name-calling. Indeed that is one of the evolutionist primary tactics and it has nothing to do with science.
The evolutionist must attack the credentials and the intelligence of anyone who expresses doubt in their beliefs. Why? because there is so little scientific evidence that supports evolution. And what little evidence they have is highly questionable.
So the more time you can get people to spend defending themselves, the less time they have to present factual data about the unscientific notions upon which the theory of evolution is based. I tend to ignore the personal attacks and focus on science, and that’s the last thing an evolutionist wants to happen.