To: lasereye
They do have the DNA of many of the animals extant upon the Earth, and if all of those different species descended over a few thousand years from those few species that could fit on a boat of known dimensions, then the change in genetic DNA over that time span is far greater than 2%.
So how do you reconcile your belief in massive evolutionary change in a short time, far exceeding a 2% genetic DNA change (while somehow limited to staying within a kind), while simultaneously deny that slow incremental evolutionary change over millions of years can derive a 2% genetic difference?
47 posted on
06/08/2010 12:37:50 PM PDT by
allmendream
(Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
To: allmendream
There was one of each "kind" meaning there was one type of horse, as opposed to 20 kinds of horses. There was one type of wolf, not 20 or a hundred. Wolf is a kind, horse is a kind. The evolution has been changes into various kinds of horses, wolves etc. The DNA difference between different types of wolves would presumably be a lot less than between humans and apes.
49 posted on
06/08/2010 12:51:16 PM PDT by
lasereye
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson