Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lasereye
They do have the DNA of many of the animals extant upon the Earth, and if all of those different species descended over a few thousand years from those few species that could fit on a boat of known dimensions, then the change in genetic DNA over that time span is far greater than 2%.

So how do you reconcile your belief in massive evolutionary change in a short time, far exceeding a 2% genetic DNA change (while somehow limited to staying within a “kind”), while simultaneously deny that slow incremental evolutionary change over millions of years can derive a 2% genetic difference?

47 posted on 06/08/2010 12:37:50 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
There was one of each "kind" meaning there was one type of horse, as opposed to 20 kinds of horses. There was one type of wolf, not 20 or a hundred. Wolf is a kind, horse is a kind. The evolution has been changes into various kinds of horses, wolves etc. The DNA difference between different types of wolves would presumably be a lot less than between humans and apes.
49 posted on 06/08/2010 12:51:16 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson