[lasereye]

I don't know what you mean by "to the same extent". Are you comparing fossilized dinosaurs to fossilized mammals and saying they're different, or comparing dinos to mammals that died fairly recently and haven't fossilized at all?

What I'm saying is, maybe bone fossilization takes 2,000 years or something like that, and the dinosaurs died out 4,000 years ago. So all their bones would be fossilized by now. Mammals on the other hand are still around in large numbers.

Biblical apologetics as to how a god could lie and make starlight from objects that never even existed within the last six thousand years is not a theory, it is apologetics.

I think you're the one who is not understanding. As I said that's not what his theory says at all. The stars were there in the last 6,000 years. Starlight and Time is a completely scientific analysis, using Relativity Theory.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Russell_Humphreys

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-starlight-prove

http://www.icr.org/news/44/

[allmendream]

What I mean is that dinosaur bones all look OLD, far older than a two thousand year old elephant bone or even a six thousand year old elephant bone.

How do you explain the EXTENT of fossilization present in ALL dinosaur bones that is not present in the remains of ANY modern mammalian mega fauna?

And it is not a “theory”, it is biblical “apologetics”. Do you understand the difference between a scientific theory and apologetics?

Apparently not.