Starlight denoting an old star from one hundred million light years distant would be denoting a position where no star had ever been within the ‘actual’ six thousand years that you will accept as the age of the universe. Thus this beam of light would LOOK like it was from a star, but no star was ever there. Does your god lie. The God I worship doesn't lie.
Starlight denoting an old star from one hundred million light years distant would be denoting a position where no star had ever been within the actual six thousand years that you will accept as the age of the universe.
Based on how his theory works, I don't believe that's true.