I HAVE looked up the stats. Perhaps you haven’t, or you misunderstood them, because every single reputable study’s authors, from the CDC to the AVMA to the National Canine Research Council all say that owner irresponsibility is the most important aspect of dog attacks. Considering the overall bite numbers and the death toll have not risen since pit bulls became popular, it is only rational to conclude that the breed of dog is far less important than the type of person who owns it.
http://www.pe.com/localnews/stories/PE_News_Local_W_sattack09.48caced.html
It seems the mother had her children taken away in 2008....talk about irresponsible!
This is from 2002, and there are more pits out there now and the total stats are higher.
Through January 20, 2002, the log of life-threatening and fatal attacks showed that pit bulls had committed 592 (45%) of the 1,301 total attacks qualifying for inclusion, including 280 (21%) of the attacks on children, 222 (60%) of the attacks on adults, 51 (34%) of the fatal attacks, and 321 (45%) of the maimings and disfigurements.
Ignorance must be fun unless your the parent of one of these children.