Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question: Law Revoking U.S. Citizenship
Freedom Works, and USconstitution.net ^ | March 23, 2010 at 1:04pm | David Batman

Posted on 04/05/2010 12:41:04 AM PDT by Yosemitest



TOPICS: Education; History; Society
KEYWORDS: citizenship; nationalsocialists; obama; pelosi; socialist; traitors; uscitizenship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
My Question:

I looked for this for several hours. The only thing I found was this:


1 posted on 04/05/2010 12:41:04 AM PDT by Yosemitest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Interesting.


2 posted on 04/05/2010 12:42:42 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

Ping for later.


3 posted on 04/05/2010 12:44:54 AM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Nonsense.


4 posted on 04/05/2010 12:46:40 AM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I’d be EXTREMELY surprised that you could lose your citizenship by a popularity contest. And if that was the case, it should be unconstitutional. NO ONE can take your citizenship from you.


5 posted on 04/05/2010 12:52:31 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Indonesia doesn’t allow dual citizenship and Obama was listed on his school record there as a citizen of that country. So how was he a U.S. citizen, too?


6 posted on 04/05/2010 12:53:55 AM PDT by TigerBait
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

7 posted on 04/05/2010 12:54:31 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

While I generally agree with you, there is one case that I would make for revoking of citizenship. In the case where a person has been convicted of either treason or sedition.


8 posted on 04/05/2010 1:00:37 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Didn't I take an oath: while I served in the military, and was trained on the proper use of firearms?
9 posted on 04/05/2010 1:10:11 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Sorry, not following your train of thought. I’m not sure who or what you were responding to.


10 posted on 04/05/2010 1:12:26 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

That exists, and it would be argued that by committing treason or sedition you voluntarily surrendered your citizenship.

Having people simply decide you were no longer a citizen without actions on your part is ludicrous, in my opinion.


11 posted on 04/05/2010 1:15:54 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

I believe we are in agreement then.


12 posted on 04/05/2010 1:17:17 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
"there is one case that I would make for revoking of citizenship.
In the case where a person has been convicted of either treason or sedition."

There are many reasons I'd revoke citizenship,

As a military retiree, there are many reasons to support, and to look for an original source, of such a law.
A person who has dedicated more than twenty years of their life to defending this country, putting their life on the line,
could easily cheer the deportation, and personally escort a revoked-citizenship person out of this country.

Now do you understand, and do you have anything to add?

13 posted on 04/05/2010 1:23:13 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Is this correct?

Obviously not. There would be enough signatures just from DU to get the entire republican party kicked out of the country.

14 posted on 04/05/2010 1:32:11 AM PDT by Hardraade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Dont forget that what ever tools and powers you put into the hands of government, they will be used by both sides of the political spectrum.

Would you trust Hillary to decide that you were not being true to the Constitution and that you would then have your citizenship taken away. Miss “FBI files” herself?

Government like fire is a tool to be feared, because in the wrong hands it can be turned against you.


15 posted on 04/05/2010 2:16:02 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerBait
Because it matters not to US law what Indonesian law or British law says.
16 posted on 04/05/2010 3:43:47 AM PDT by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

“And if that was the case, it should be unconstitutional.”

Even the most popular presidents have at least 50,000 citizens who don’t like what they are doing or would prefer someone else in office. It would make no sense that 50,000 citizens could achieve something that requires a majority of the House and two-thirds of the Senate to achieve. If this were possible, every election would be followed by an immediate effort to have the newly elected president stripped of his citizenship and deported.


17 posted on 04/05/2010 3:57:43 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

If that were true then the liberals would have Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney and Karl Rove out of the country by sundown.


18 posted on 04/05/2010 4:02:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyb
Because it matters not to US law what Indonesian law or British law says.

Oh no, you can't say that! If the US Law is not subservient to those foreign laws (Indonesia and the UK) then how do the birthers justify the "dual citizenship means not an NBC" line of thought?

19 posted on 04/05/2010 4:15:29 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
There are many reasons I'd revoke citizenship,
and an attack on the U.S. Constitution is just one of them.

If that was the sole standard, we'd have to expel more than half of congress!

20 posted on 04/05/2010 8:31:51 AM PDT by JimRed (To water the Tree of Liberty is to excise a cancer before it kills us. TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson