Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Straight Vermonter
The Supremes, especially in the 1930s in upholding much of Roosvelt's Raw Deal, did stretch the interstate commerce clause as much as they did in finding the right to privacy in the first amendment.

But they did not find that congress can regulate anything and everything just because they want to.

35 posted on 04/04/2010 5:06:25 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo
They came pretty damn close to it.

Even if activity be local and though it may not be regarded as commerce, it may still, whatever its nature, be reached by Congress if it exerts a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce, and this irrespective of whether such effect is what might at some earlier time be defined as "direct" or "indirect."

Wickard v. Filburn

37 posted on 04/04/2010 5:23:37 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson