The software was quite accurate about stock trends.
And then they discovered it was accurate in virtually mystical ways . . . I think their explanations are as off the wall as anything about that . . .
however, the fact remains . . . the software tends to be more accurate than not.
I don’t know what % I think I’ve seen 70-80% something accuracy tossed about.
BUT NOT ABOUT TIMING.
timing is still often wrong.
One hypothesis about that is that things are quite fluid and change often and quickly on timing.
I don’t know.
Interesting, anyway.
Thx.
Thanks. It was interesting that right after I posted that I saw the thread about the false report of an 8.0 quake in the Dominican Republic.