Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: myknowledge


just like its nominal predecessor, the F-111

Somewhere in my book collection, I have a small book on failed aircraft.

I remember that after all the work on the F-111, one military officer
said (in so many words) “All the thrust in Christendom couldn’t
turn the F-111 into a fighter!”.

True or not, it was an interesting comment.


11 posted on 04/02/2010 7:33:42 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VOA
I remember that after all the work on the F-111, one military officer said (in so many words) “All the thrust in Christendom couldn’t turn the F-111 into a fighter!”.

True or not, it was an interesting comment.

True. Manual wing sweep, poor visibility due to the side-by-side seating and no rearward view, very basic air-to-air radar with no doppler look-down capability and could only track one target at a time, and a gun that replaced one of the internal bomb bay doors.

It was a low level penetrator for the Air Force, and was going to be a standoff AIM-54 launch platform for the Navy.

Regardless of weight issues, the Navy was never going to accept the F-111B as a fleet defense aircraft, nor should they.

12 posted on 04/02/2010 9:09:59 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson