[Tallguy]

For the Eagles to expect that sort compensation from any team is laughable, given McNabb’s age and record with the Eagles. In McNabb’s defense, success as a QB in the NFL depends heavily on a great offensive line and a talented collection of receivers and running backs. In the end, though, it’s McNabb’s post-season failure that will greatly reduce his value on the open market of NFL trades and free agency.

I agree with much of what you say, but a high-2nd round pick for a QB of McNabb's level doesn't strike me as too much, but we'll see. Consider the 'failure rate' of college QB's take with a similar pick (or even a 1st). With McNabb you know that you are getting a decent QB.

I would agree that McNabb has never had a credible running game. Who knows how good a runner Westbrook might have been in a more balanced offensive scheme?

I personally think that a WR's rep is to a large extent determined by the QB's ability to put the ball in the prefered spot consistently. McNabb's got a strong arm, but his accuracy ranges from 'good' to 'WTF?' depending on the game. I'm not sure better receivers are the answer with him.

[NoDRodee]

Oh, If Vick starts they may win the SuperBowl

[SZonian]

"McNabb's got a strong arm, but his accuracy ranges from 'good' to 'WTF?'"

That's my problem with him as well. Notwithstanding that he'll miss open receivers and throw into 2 and 3 coverage with the inevitable interception.

There have been many times I have to had walk away from watching an Eagles game because of his inconsistency. I was afraid I was going to throw something through my tv.

[bigredkitty1]

We shall see what shakes out. If a team thinks they only need a QB, he could be a good fit. However, he would need to work on his accuracy.