Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IYAS9YAS

>To a family member by marriage, Obama was The Man in November 2008 and Palin was an idiot.
>
>To the same relative in December 2009, Obama was the idiot.
>
>I tried to stifle my smirk.

Just because “Obama is an idiot” doesn’t mean that “Sarah Palin is NOT an idiot,” logically speaking. There’s no association/relation between the objects “Obama” and “Sarah Palin.”


23 posted on 03/24/2010 11:46:25 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
Just because “Obama is an idiot” doesn’t mean that “Sarah Palin is NOT an idiot,” logically speaking. There’s no association/relation between the objects “Obama” and “Sarah Palin.”

I didn't say there was or wasn't. I simply noted what a family member said. He didn't mention any change in view toward Palin, just toward Obama.

40 posted on 03/24/2010 12:16:40 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson