There’s the problem. The guy (Britt) who heard it is now dead.
I posted the article after hearing about it on Fox News, but
my memory is failing me on details of the case and the movie. I just remember that his father-in-law’s change of heart and his book - were very persuasive.
Thats true. My point was if in fact she was lying, and he told her the consequece of her lie would be being charged (about being there) how is that being coerced?
This in my opinion is not enough to gain a new trial. Only conclusive DNA would make me doubt his guilt.